Your Guide to Identifying the ‘Corrupt’ Politicians in Montana

BUTTE, MT - Corruption in politics is often shrouded in mystery.

Get our free mobile app

Here in Montana, where the landscape is vast but the population is small, the actions of a politician can have a profound impact. But how can you tell if a politician in the Treasure State is corrupt? And more importantly, what does that corruption even look like if it were to exist?

Here’s your guide to identifying a potentially corrupt Montanan politician, without throwing accusations or implications at any one individual because—let’s face it—we don’t really know if any of them are (or if they all are, to some extent). To be very clear, we have no political intentions, affiliations, or validity with the presented items, nor are we pointing a finger at anyone or anything. We are an entertainment platform, after all.

Show Me The Money

Let’s start with the bread and butter of corruption: money. Or, to be more specific, funding.

In Montana, with its abundance of natural resources and its growing industries like tourism and tech, there's no shortage of groups willing to "invest" in a politician’s career. A corrupt politician would likely have deep financial ties to specific industries, particularly:

Energy Companies: Montana’s coal, oil, and renewable energy sectors are inherently endowed with considerable power. Watch for politicians who receive significant donations from energy lobbyists, while advocating for legislation that favors the industry. Think environmental rollbacks, tax breaks, or lenient oversight on mining.

Agriculture and Ranching Interests: Agriculture is the backbone of Montana’s economy, and some politicians may receive funding in exchange for favorable trade deals, water rights allocations, or regulations that benefit large landowners.

Out-of-State Developers: As Montana becomes more attractive to out-of-state interests, especially in the almighty real estate, corrupt politicians might accept contributions from these groups to smooth the way for gentrification, deforestation, or the sale of public lands, all in the name of "growth" and the "economy."

Of course, campaign donations are not inherently corrupt, but the secretive PACs (Political Action Committees) that back these politicians are worth keeping an eye on. If you notice a local representative suddenly pushing hard for legislation that seems oddly specific to one industry, you may want to follow the money.

However, don’t jump to conclusions too quickly: sometimes, even those who aren’t corrupt get funneled into these financial arrangements just to stay competitive.

How Much Influence and Authority Do They Have?

Montana's political structure grants certain officials a surprising amount of authority. But corruption doesn’t necessarily mean unchecked power and extreme detriment; it’s often more about carefully crafted influence.

A corrupt Montana politician might not overhaul the entire state system overnight, but, theoretically, they could:

Manipulate Tax Codes: With a relatively low population, Montana’s tax laws are critical for balancing big budgets. Corrupt politicians might advocate for tax incentives or loopholes benefiting their largest donors, claiming it’s about “job creation,” while everyday Montanans see little in return.

Sway Infrastructure Projects: Infrastructure is key in Montana’s rural areas, and politicians who have control over these projects could redirect funds to benefit specific contractors or regions. Look for politicians whose donors just happen to secure massive state contracts.

However, a corrupt politician might not be able to change everything. In a state where grassroots organizations and watchdog groups are active, even the most powerful officials could be held accountable, at least to some extent. But if they hold sway over a particular issue, such as land use or taxation, the consequences could ripple across the state.

The Role of Mass Media

As we all know too well, it’s hard to escape the influence of the media.

They can range from local papers to national networks, and the role each plays can offer a clue to corruption. But, admittedly, it’s tricky. If a politician is truly corrupt, the media could either be blowing the whistle or actively complicit.

Here’s how you might be able to spot the difference:

Sympathetic Coverage: If a politician is receiving overwhelmingly positive coverage from one or two media outlets, especially if those outlets are owned by a conglomerate or have deep ties to a particular industry, it’s worth considering if they're being propped up or not.

Scandal Fatigue: A corrupt politician might face constant scandal coverage—so much that the public becomes numb to it. Endless but surface-level reporting could be a media strategy to obscure deeper corruption by making it all just seem like, “Yes, this is bad... but is it really that bad compared to this person?"

Investigative Reporting: The real test is whether independent or investigative journalists are digging into the politician’s financial ties, legislative history, and potential conflicts of interest. But even then, you have to ask yourself, "Who is funding the journalists?"

In smaller towns and cities across Montana, the relationship between politicians and the media can become especially intimate, making it difficult for citizens to separate truth from narrative.

However, it is important to remember that these media techniques could be just that, long-utilized and unoriginal techniques, and aren't always tools of the corrupt.

Can We Ever Really Know Who’s Corrupt?

The million-dollar question (perhaps literally) is whether we can ever know if a politician is truly corrupt, or is just a "normal" politician playing the game of modern politics.

The reality is that corruption is rarely blatant and is usually multi-layered, all laced with plausible deniability. Politicians will often follow the letter of the law while bending the system in ways that benefit themselves or their donors. And, in some cases, what looks like corruption may just be the messy, imperfect world of politics.

Consider this: every politician in Montana, or anywhere for that matter, operates within a complex web of donations, public expectations, and personal ambition. To some degree, they’re all influenced by outside forces. The real question isn’t so much if they’re corrupt, but to what extent they are and what that really means for the average citizen.

A politician who takes money from a large energy company might argue they’re securing jobs for Montanans, while others call it cronyism politics. Another politician might refuse big money but struggle to win reelection due to a lack of resources. Corruption, in the end, may be more about the system itself than the individual caught up in it.

Stay Informed, Stay Skeptical

So, what does a corrupt Montanan politician look like? They could be anyone, or they could be no one.

Corruption doesn’t always come with a flashing neon sign, and in a state as tightly wound as Montana, it’s even harder to spot. The key is to stay informed, follow the money, and always maintain a healthy level of skepticism toward both politicians and the media.

Seriously, the line between serving the people and serving oneself can be thinner than fishin' line. It’s up to us Montanans to hold their leaders accountable, without falling prey to overblown conspiracy theories or blind faith in the system.